By convention a review starts with a description of the
plot’s setup. I hope you will forgive me if this sounds like the perverted
dreams of a feverish addict. Cochlea and Eustachia, two identical girls of
uncertain species, wearing only negligees and domino masks, explore the home
(?) of a disturbed scientist (?) whose head is a sooty cotton bud. The girls
explore the condemned manor, where bloodless viscera vines the walls. They
witness another identical girl steal a book from a hairless borrower living in
an owl statue. I won’t go on – not for fear of spoiling the story, just that I
doubt I could describe it.
Rickheit’s story flows like a dream. Though not a nightmare.
A nightmare terrifies. This dream possesses an internal logic, or rather a
sensibility, that pushes the plot forward, inuring you to its unsettling
insanity. Moments that should unsettle the reader, such as a gynaecological
examination from David Lynch’s amygdala, seem natural. The backup story, ‘How
It Works’, referring to the creative process, captures this dream style. It
depicts the girls approaching Rickheit while he sleeps, opening his head, and
laying an ungeziefer in his brain.
That’s the thing, the book seems a dream, and like a dream
I’ve little idea what to say of it. I could comment on the Freudian imagery,
the sexualised filles, the
incomprehensible motives of the antagonist (?), the possible purpose of the
not-quite-internal-organs dripping here and there, but that would suppose the
images hold a deeper meaning. If all these images arise from a unifying
thematic base, then I’ll call this a difficult work, a work I’ve not even begun
to comprehend. But I will take the view that Rickheit intended only to craft an
aesthetic experience, an alluring grotesquery designed to consume the reader.
Rickheit’s drawing style manages to have tonally disparate
images gel. While the two leads look as if they’ve escaped from a soft-smut
comic, the world feels conceived by a surrealist coming down from a high. These
contrasting tones never jar the reader. They feel parts of the same whole. At times the cute and the unsettling overlap,
as with the borrower I mentioned before.
The story-telling helps the reader accept the weirdness in
the panels themselves. Panels progress as in a breezy adventure comic. Even
without words the reader can grasp the narrative’s flow. That’s no
exaggeration. A lot of the comic goes dialogue-less, leaving the reader to put
together… whatever there is to put together. Even those spoken words give the
reader, at most, a slight insight into the leads’ personalities.
Don’t enter this work expecting to plumb a deeper message.
Plunge into its blood-treacle atmosphere, and swim through its uncanny world.
And given this slim volume is the first print edition of an ongoing webcomic,
those who enjoyed the ride know where to get on next.
Webcomic: www.chromefetus.com/jeffrey1.html
Pictures taken from Fantagraphics’ 1st Edition
2014 printing
This dream-like comics creates a world of a hybrid between machines and nature. Its style focuses on details, and all those black, black backgrounds… The conversational bubbles (technically speech balloons) should not be there, I wish no character would talk, and it is not necessary for they do not add anything helpful to interpret anything, but that is not fair. The point is that the created world is so bizarre and the style is so surrealism that one could just stare at one panel, one page, and enjoy the break of the expectation. However, the artist did not draw any sound effects or speech or speed line, so his action sequence lacks of energy, but he makes up with its uncertainty. What would happen if you have been captured or hit or touched or…? Everything can be fatal, and these little girls are definitely not humans. Everything is never explained (but the girls’ original story might be explained a little in the following chapter about their origins, but I do not have the energy to finish it). One aspect I dislike about such art is the sexual imagery or suggestion, or the broken bodies, organs in general. It is very, very unpleasant feeling to be stripped nakedly in a conscious level to face all human’s either animal or sexual or instinctual desires. I could not speak about interpretation about people are capable of coming up with one, but I guess there is going to be the argument that I project myself into the interpretation than otherwise, and I feel a little disguised by what I have seen there.
ReplyDeleteI mean 'disgust', not 'disguised', but all in all, I feel uncomfortable in facing some imageries here and there.
Delete